(1) a $50,000 grant was made to help fund a business incubator; (2) a $33,500 grant was made to a Native American tribe for technical assistance in implementing a business plan; (3) a $344,500 grant was made to provide technical assistance in an Enterprise Community.
Established in 1862, the Department of Agriculture serves all Americans through anti-hunger efforts, stewardship of nearly 200 million acres of national forest and rangelands, and through product safety and conservation efforts. The USDA opens markets for American farmers and ranchers and provides food for needy people around the world.
|Recipient||Amount||Start Date||End Date|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 1,600,000||   ||2020-07-15||2022-07-15|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 0||   ||2020-07-14||2022-07-14|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 1,500,000||   ||2019-08-08||2021-08-08|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 0||   ||2019-08-01||2021-08-01|
|Appalachian Regional Commission||$ 1,521,027||   ||2019-07-11||2021-07-11|
|Appalachian Regional Commission||$ 0||   ||2019-06-25||2021-06-25|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 1,500,000||   ||2019-02-13||2021-02-13|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 1,499,661||   ||2017-09-27||2021-01-04|
|Appalachian Regional Commission||$ 1,500,000||   ||2018-09-25||2020-09-25|
|Delta Regional Authority||$ 1,400,000||   ||2020-07-15||2020-07-15|
In fiscal year 2007, 107 grants were made. In FY 2008 the number of grants were 38. It is anticipated that in FY 2009, approximately the same number will be funded.
Uses and Use Restrictions
Grant funds may be used to assist in the economic development of rural areas by providing technical assistance, training, and planning for business and economic development.
Grants may be made to public bodies, nonprofit corporations, Indian tribes on Federal or State reservations or other Federally recognized tribal groups, and cooperatives with members that are primarily rural residents and that conduct activities for the mutual benefit of the members.
Rural communities and businesses in rural areas.
Evidence of legal capacity. Evidence of financial strength and expertise in activities such as proposed in the application, sufficient to ensure accomplishment of the activities and objectives described in the application. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87.
Aplication and Award Process
This program is subject to coverage under E.O.
12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in the State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
This program is subject to environmental review requirements; however, most applications are expected to qualify as general exclusions.
Potential applicants should file Standard Form 424.1, "Application for Federal Assistance (For Nonconstruction)," and additional material required by Agency regulations with the USDA Rural Development State Office. The application will include a written narrative and scope of work. More details are available from the Headquarters Office or any Rural Development State Office.
Applications will be given a priority score in accordance with the criteria set out in the program regulations.
Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Section 741, Public Law 104-127.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time
30 days to 1 year.
Adverse decision may be appealed in accordance with procedures set out at 7 CFR 11.
Formula and Matching Requirements
This program has no statutory formula or matching requirements, although availability of matching funds is considered in determining priority.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance
Funding for complete projects is limited to projects that can be completed within 2 years. Projects of longer duration may only be funded for 1 year at a time.
Post Assistance Requirements
Grantees must provide a financial report and performance activity report quarterly while the project is in process, and a project evaluation report within 1 year after the project is completed.
In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-133 (Revised, June 27, 2003), "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations," nonfederal entities that expend financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Nonfederal entities that expend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133.
Records and accounts must be maintained to reflect the operations of the project.
FY 07 $6,939,689; FY 08 $2,634,610; and FY 09 est $2,634,600.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance
$12,000 to $344,750. Average: $78,846.
Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature
Implementing regulations were published in the Federal Register (64 FR 71984) on December 23, 1999. The CFR citation is 7 CFR 4284, Subpart G.
Regional or Local Office
Contact the appropriate Rural Development State Office listed in Appendix IV of the Catalog.
Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA, Specialty Lenders Division, STOP 3225, Room 6767, 1400 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, DC 20250-1521. Telephone: (202) 720-1400.
Criteria for Selecting Proposals
Grant selection criteria include the extent to which economic development resulting from the proposed project will be sustainable over the long term; the extent to which the project should lead to improvements in the quality of economic activity within the community, such as higher wages, improved benefits, greater career potential, and the use of higher level skills; the amount of leveraging of funds from other sources; service to communities that are experiencing trauma due to a major natural disaster or the closing or major downsizing of a military facility or other major employer; service to communities that have remained consistently poor over the long term or have experienced long term population decline or job deterioration; and the extent of the project's usefulness as a best practice that may serve as a model for other communities.
Why should intrapreneurs matter to social entrepreneurs? Both are believers and battlers, both are entrepreneurs. To accentuate similarities and differences: