1) Cell-Based Sensors that link Nanotechnology with Microfluidics.
(2) Nanostructural Engineering of Complex Functional Particles.
(3) Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES).
(4) Rapid Fabrication of Non-Assembly Mechanisms with Embedded Components.
(5) Development of Biosensors for Rapid Screening.
(6) Health Monitoring of Critical Civil Infrastructure for Safety and Security.
(7) Liquid Logic-The 3rd Wave in Electronics.
(8) Internally Mounted Engines for Aircraft of the Future.
(9) Particle Laden Tubeless Siphon With Applications to Homeland Defense.
(10) MEMS Tuners for Multi-band High Efficiency Wireless Transmitters.
(11) Nanotube-Based Electronic Pressure Sensor.
(12) SBIR Research: Development of a Novel Sensing Material for Waterborne Pathogens.
The National Science Foundation is an independent Federal agency created to promote the progress of science, to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare and to secure the national defense. The NSF annually funds approximately 20 percent of basic, Federally-supported college and university research.
|Recipient||Amount||Start Date||End Date|
|American Society For Engineering Education||$ 13,552,168||   ||2021-06-01||2027-05-31|
|Washington State University||$ 567,113||   ||2022-01-01||2026-12-31|
|University Of California, Los Angeles||$ 700,000||   ||2021-10-01||2026-09-30|
|University Of Cincinnati||$ 594,948||   ||2021-10-01||2026-09-30|
|Leland Stanford Junior University, The||$ 400,000||   ||2021-10-01||2026-09-30|
|President And Board Of Trustees Of Santa Clara College||$ 413,517||   ||2021-09-01||2026-08-31|
|University Of Oklahoma||$ 459,938||   ||2021-09-01||2026-08-31|
|Case Western Reserve University||$ 424,957||   ||2021-09-01||2026-08-31|
|Duke University||$ 580,158||   ||2021-09-01||2026-08-31|
|Regents Of The University Of Michigan||$ 404,355||   ||2021-09-01||2026-08-31|
In fiscal year 2006, 9,427 proposals were received and 1,737 awards were made. In fiscal year 2007, 9,575 proposals were received and 1,958 awards were made, and in fiscal year 2008 approximately 9,890 proposals will be received and about 1,978 awards will be made.
Uses and Use Restrictions
Funds may be used for paying costs to conduct research, such as salaries and wages, equipment and supplies, travel, publication costs, other direct costs, and indirect costs.
This program does not provide support for inventions, product development, marketing, pilot plant efforts, technical assistance, or research requiring security classifications.
Public and private colleges and universities; Non-profit, non-academic organizations; For-profit organizations; State and Local Governments; and unaffiliated scientists under special circumstances.
See the Grant Proposal Guide for a full description of eligibility requirements.
See the Grant Proposal Guide, Section I.E. for a full description of eligibility requirements.
The proposal must be signed electronically by an official authorized to commit the institution or organization in business and financial affairs and who can commit the organization to certain proposal certifications. Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB Circular Nos. A-21 for colleges and universities and A-122 for nonprofit organizations. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87.
Aplication and Award Process
None required for unsolicited proposals, but preliminary discussions with relevant National Science Foundation program officer, by telephone or mail, is encouraged if specific program information is needed.
Special proposal competitions may specify preliminary proposal requirements.
This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No.
This program is excluded from coverage under E.O.
Proposals must be submitted electronically via FastLane to the Engineering Programs and should follow the general instructions and guidelines in the NSF "Grant Proposal Guide." Research proposals for support under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program must be submitted in response to an annual solicitation. All proposals are acknowledged. These programs are subject to the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-110.
NSF staff members review and evaluate all proposals with the assistance and advice of scientists and engineers who are specialists in the field covered by the proposal, of prospective users of research results when appropriate, and of specialists in other Federal agencies when appropriate.
Many NSF programs accept proposals at any time. Other programs, however, establish due dates for submission of proposals. NSF utilizes Target Dates, Deadline Dates, and Submission Windows. Consult the Grant Proposal Guide, Section I.F. for a further description of these types of due dates. See the Directorate's web pages for deadlines for unsolicited research proposals (http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=ENG). Proposers should contact the program officer listed under the Information Contacts section of this program for dates on specific programs.
National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended, Public Law 107-368, 42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time
Approximately 3 to 7 months.
The Principal Investigator may request, in writing, that the Foundation reconsider its action in declining any proposal, renewal, or continuing grant proposal.
NSF awards the following types of grants: 1) Standard Grants, in which NSF agrees to support a specified level of effort for a specified period of time, with no statement of NSF intent to provide additional future support. Proposals for renewal of a Standard Grant compete with all other pending proposals. 2) Continuing Grants, in which NSF agrees to support a specified level of effort for a specified period of time, with a statement of intent to provide additional support for the project, provided funds are available and the results achieved warrant further support. Funding is normally in one-year increments. Some awards are made as cooperative agreements when substantial NSF involvement is required during the project performance period. Renewals are not allowed for the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program.
Formula and Matching Requirements
The Grant Proposal Guide (GPG)(Chapter II) and the Grant Policy Manual (Sec. 330) provide additional information on the general NSF policy on cost-sharing. The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program is a phased project program. Phase I is a feasibility study up to 6 months. Phase II is the principal research program for up to 24 months.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance
Normally 6 months to 3 years, occasionally longer.
Post Assistance Requirements
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant program office at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after the expiration of a grant, the PI is required to submit a final project report.
Quarterly Federal Cash Transaction Reports are required.
Other reporting requirements may be imposed via the grant instrument.
In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-133 (Revised, June 27, 2003), "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations," nonfederal entities that expend financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Nonfederal entities that expend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133.
Grantees are expected to maintain separate records for each grant to ensure that funds are used for the general purpose for which the award was made. Records are subject to inspection during the life of the award and for 3 years thereafter.
(Grants and Contracts) FY 07 $629,990,000; FY 08 est $636,870,000; and FY 09 est not reported.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance
$5,000 to $4,000,000; $120,000.
Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature
45 CFR Chapter VI; 48 CFR Chapter 25; "NSF Guide to Programs, fiscal year 2004," NSF 04-009 (http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf04009); and "Grant Proposal Guide," (http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf0423); selected solicitations include "Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs Phase I Solicitation," NSF 06-553; "Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER)," NSF 05-579; "Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI)," NSF 98-142; "Major Research Instrumentation (MRI)," NSF 05-515. For descriptions of ENG funding opportunities, please check the NSF Directorate for Engineering web site. The URL address is: http://www.eng.nsf.gov/.
Regional or Local Office
For information and publications: Dr. Donald Senich, Program Director, Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry, Directorate for Engineering, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7082. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, NSF World Wide Web site, URL: http//www.nsf.gov/. For general inquiries: email@example.com.
Criteria for Selecting Proposals
The National Science Board approved revised criteria for evaluating proposals at its meeting on March 28, 1997 (NSB 97-72). All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities. On July 8, 2002, the NSF Director issued Important Notice 127, Implementation of new Grant Proposal Guide Requirements Related to the Broader Impacts Criterion. This Important Notice reinforces the importance of addressing both criteria in the preparation and review of all proposals submitted to NSF. NSF continues to strengthen its internal processes to ensure that both of the merit review criteria are addressed when making funding decisions. In an effort to increase compliance with these requirements, the January 2002 issuance of the GPG incorporated revised proposal preparation guidelines relating to the development of the Project Summary and Project Description. Chapter II of the GPG specifies that Principal Investigators (PIs) must address both merit review criteria in separate statements within the one-page Project Summary. This chapter also reiterates that broader impacts resulting from the proposed project must be addressed in the Project Description and described as an integral part of the narrative. Effective October 1, 2002, NSF will return without review proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the Project Summary. It is believed that these changes to NSF proposal preparation and processing guidelines will more clearly articulate the importance of broader impacts to NSF-funded projects. The two National Science Board's approved merit review criteria are listed below (see the Grant Proposal Guide Chapter III.A for further information). The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments. What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society? NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions: Integration of Research and Education. One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitementofdiscoveryandenrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives. Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities. Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.
Adam Braun, founder of Pencils of Promise, is giving nonprofits a no-nonsense way to bring entrepreneurship to the next level. Pencils of Promise is a philanthropic organization that focuses on forming sustainable educational programs, and forging long-lasting, partnerships with communities. The organization aims to increase access to quality education and impact students and their families in high-need communities throughout Laos, Ghana and Guatemala.