Grants have been awarded to conduct research on: (1) Hyperspectral data analysis techniques (2) improved materials and methods for gamma-ray and neutron detection (3) and (4) seismic research to improve detection, location, and discrimination of nuclear detonations.
The Department of Energy's goal is to advance national, economic and energy security in the U.S.; to promote scientific and technological innovation in support of that goal; and to ensure environmental cleanup of the national nuclear weapons complex.
|Recipient||Amount||Start Date||End Date|
|Conference Of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc.||$ 20,914||   ||2021-05-17||2024-05-16|
|Varian Medical Systems Gesellschaft M.b.h.||$ 1,257,216||   ||2018-04-01||2024-04-30|
|President And Fellows Of Middlebury College||$ 296,177||   ||2018-10-01||2023-09-30|
|University Of California, San Diego||$ 333,451||   ||2018-10-01||2023-09-30|
|Pacific Forum International||$ 885,218||   ||2018-10-01||2023-09-30|
|Texas A&m Engineering Experiment Station||$ 480,000||   ||2018-10-01||2023-09-30|
|Society Of Nuclear Medicine And Molecular Imaging||$ 500,000||   ||2020-06-30||2023-06-29|
|Radiological Society Of North America, Inc.||$ 501,163||   ||2020-06-16||2023-06-15|
|University Of California, San Diego||$ 244,598||   ||2019-08-20||2022-08-19|
|Carnegie Mellon University||$ 825,000||   ||2019-07-01||2022-06-30|
The results and accomplishments from basic and applied research and development performed under these grants are reported in the open scientific literature. University research may be integrated with ongoing research and development programs at the DOE national laboratories which will facilitate access to and use of special facilities and equipment. The objective of these grants is to advance the state of knowledge on science and technology. The final product may lead to improved or new commercial products to ensure availability to the U.S. arms control and nonproliferation community. It is expected that less than 20 grants will be awarded per year.
Uses and Use Restrictions
Financial support, in whole or in part, may be provided for salaries, materials, supplies, equipment, travel, publication costs, services required for conducting nonproliferation research and development to reduce the global danger from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Construction or related costs are not allowed under these project grants.
All work must comply with export control regulations.
Universities (public and private), institutions of higher education with postdoctoral programs, and nonprofit non-government organizations (public and private) whose activities benefit the general public through results which are available to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), other U.S.
government agencies, and universities and institutions of higher learning may apply.
The NNSA, other U.S. government agencies, universities and institutions of higher learning will benefit.
Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB Circular No. A-21 for institutions of higher learning. Non-government organizations will have nonprofit status certified by the IRS.
Aplication and Award Process
This program is excluded from coverage under E.O.
The NNSA Service Center in Albuquerque, New Mexico issues Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) under which formal applications may be submitted by a scientist or principal investigator who will conduct or lead the research team. The BAAs will be posted to DOE's IIPS system which can be accessed at: http://e-center.doe.gov.
Evaluations will be conducted by technical staff assigned to the Office of Nonproliferation Research and Development or at the DOE national laboratories. Final decisions for approval are made by the cognizant program director. DOE/NNSA Procurement is then instructed to negotiate and prepare the grant award documents. Program management responsibilities may be delegated as a whole or in part to the NNSA Service Center or NNSA Site Offices.
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Section 3157, Public Law 101-189, 103 Stat. 1684, 42 U.S.C. 2051; Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, Title I, Section 107, Public Law 93-438; 88 Stat. 1240, 42 U.S.C. 5817; Federal Nonnuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 1974, Public Law 93-577; Department of Energy (DOE) Organization Act of 1977, as amended, Public Law 95-91, 42 U.S.C. 7101; Public Law 106-65; National Defense Authorization Act of 2000.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time
The range is from 60 to 90 days.
Grants will be modified and extended as required. Renewals are subject to an annual review by the Headquarters and/or NNSA Service Center.
Formula and Matching Requirements
There is no mandatory cost-sharing requirement.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance
The grant period is for up to 3 years depending upon available appropriations. The schedule of payments is arranged at the time of award.
Post Assistance Requirements
Quarterly Progress status reports and an end of project report are required.
In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-133 (Revised, June 27, 2003), "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations," nonfederal entities that expend financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Nonfederal entities that expend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133.
(Grants and Cooperative Agreements) FY 07 $12,210,324; FY 08 est $11,500,000; and FY 09 est $11,500,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance
The typical range is from $100,000 to $250,000 per year; however, some grants may be greater.
Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature
Regional or Local Office
Paul Morrison, Office of Nonproliferation Research and Development (NA-22), Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, NNSA, Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585. Telephone: (202) 586-5751.
Criteria for Selecting Proposals
The selection process will be determined on the following criteria: 1) Potential impact and relevance of proposed work; 2) technical merit; 3) qualifications of the proposed investigators; 2) quality of the proposed research plan, and 3) proposed schedule, budget and available resources.
Social enterprise leaders throughout Europe are urging local authorities to use their powers to help the third sector grow. During a two-day European Commission event in Strasbourg, councils in member states are called upon to use a variety of methods to support the sector.