The Department of Energy's goal is to advance national, economic and energy security in the U.S.; to promote scientific and technological innovation in support of that goal; and to ensure environmental cleanup of the national nuclear weapons complex.
Fiscal Year 2012: Activities conducted during 2012 include examination of ribbon separated HEPA filters and development of an AG-1 Section FI test stand. A loading curve was generated. The most penetrating particle size during this loading period was also measured. After being loaded each filter was challenged with elevated temperature and relative humidity up to 50" water column or rupture. The ribbon separated Vokes filter testing was completed. Fiscal Year 2013: Plan to start R&D on design basis events and fire failure tests on commercial HEPA filters to identify operational capabilities, failure mechanisms, profiles, and load limits. Testing results will provide increased safety margins for various commercial and Government facilities and sites in the U.S. and in other countries that manage, store, or treat radioactive waste streams e.g. commercial nuclear power facilities. R&D will also improve understanding of HEPA filter operation. Additionally, test results may provide an opportunity to update sections of the ASME AG-1 code, if test findings merit revision. Contingent on available funding, may begin preliminary studies of nuclear waste material properties and their impact on mixing/blending and transport processes and technologies. Fiscal Year 2014: Continue FY 13 R&D testing to completion.
Uses and Use Restrictions
Financial assistance is provided in support of the program objectives.
Applicants must meet the guidelines established by DOE.
A publicly owned agency or organization established to perform specialized functions or services for the benefit of all or part of the general public either without charge or at cost, making no profits and having no shareholders to receive dividends.
Includes institutions of higher education and hospitals.
Determinations are made by DOE EM Headquarters or EM Field Offices, or both.
The following organizations will significant benefit from improved and safer advanced HEPA filters: Federal/ State radioactive treatment and/or storage facilities, commercial nuclear power industry, workers in a radioactive environment, and the general public, particularly landowners or homeowners in proximity to radioactive facilities. Indirect benefits include more accurate known and understood HEPA filter failure mechanisms and limits, margins, and operational constraints, especially in emergency situations such as fire or a seismic event. Indirect benefits include deceased operating costs, and potentially improvements to the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) AG-1, the US national consensus standard for nuclear air handling and treatment systems.
Cost will also be determined in accordance with OMB Circular No. A-21 for institutions of higher education or as otherwise defined in the financial assistance instrument. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87. . This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87.
Aplication and Award Process
Preapplication coordination is not applicable.
Environmental impact information is not required for this program.
This program is excluded from coverage under E.O.
This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-102. OMB Circular No. A-110 applies to this program. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-102. OMB Circular No. A-110 applies to this program. A formal proposal by the organization interested doing the work must be submitted through an appropriate official of the corporate entity, organization, or institution. Financial assistance requests will be reviewed pursuant to the Department of Energy Financial Assistance Regulations at 10 CFR 600 and the DOE Merit Review Guide, as amended.
Award decision will be made by DOE Headquarters.
Contact the headquarters or regional office, as appropriate, for application deadlines.
The activity conducted under this award is authorized pursuant to: The Department of Energy Act, Public Law 95-91, 42 U.S.C. 7256, in conjunction with 42 U.S.C. 7112.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time
The approximate approval/disapproval time is from two months to one year.
From 120 to 180 days. From 120 to 180 days. Proposal for renewal are subject to review and acceptance by DOE Headquarters, the field, or both.
Formula and Matching Requirements
This program has no statutory formula.
This program has no matching requirements.
This program does not have MOE requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance
Length and time phasing of assistance will vary with the program phase and activity. Method of awards/ releasing assistance: awards will be incrementally funded. See the following for information on how assistance is awarded/released. See the following for information on how assistance is awarded/released: Awards will be incrementally funded.
Post Assistance Requirements
Yes, periodic program and progress reports are required per the Reporting Requirements Checklist attached to the award.
No cash reports are required.
At a minimum, annual progress reports are required.
Frequency of progress reports will be determined at time of award.
Expenditure reports will be required.
The type and frequency will be determined at time of award.
Performance monitoring will be required.
The type and frequency will be determined at time of award.
In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-133 (Revised, June 27, 2003), "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations," nonfederal entities that expend financial assistance of $500,000 or more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Nonfederal entities that expend less than $500,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No. A-133. Audits will be conducted annually or as defined by the size of and the specific award provisions.
Retention of records will be required in accordance with 10 CFR 600. A grantee is expected to maintain auditable records to substantiate the total costs under the Cooperative Agreement. The grantee is also expected to keep and maintain applicable American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Nuclear Quality Assurance-1 (NQA-1) and other quality assurance testing and results records as needed.
(Salaries) FY 12 Not Available; FY 13 est $731,000; and FY 14 est $1,000,000 - subject to funds availability.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance
No Data Available.
Regulations, Guidelines, and Literature
Regional or Local Office
Dr. John R. Shultz 19901 Germantown Road, Germantown, Maryland 20874 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 3019032422
Criteria for Selecting Proposals
Research must be beneficial to the overall accomplishment of the program objectives and consistent with the criteria of the EM Merit Review System (i.e., technically meritorious, qualified principal investigators, adequate facilities for conduct of the work, past experience and performance history).
Steven Cornish, founder of aimwith, based in Silicon Valley, CA, is a social equity marketplace for impact where crowdfunders, impact investors, and charitable organizations invest in change together.